MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 406, 408, 420, 468 and 470 Termination of Proceedings The Complainant alleges no business relationship with the accused. And neither did he accuse him of paying any disputed money. The complainant was unable to file a complaint against the accused in this case. The complainant was the resident of the complainant \ C of the presence of the agreement between the parties and the alleged transaction between the two parties was also at the same place. To put pressure on the accused only, the reason for the move to place \ B place in another province transferred was alleged to have raised the disputed amount of money as advanced, thus creating no criminal liability. Can be granted, pending action against the accused has been ordered to be canceled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Samma Satta lawyer