LAL ZAMURRAD versus STATE
Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 (b) / 34 Testimonies of Evidence Eyewitnesses were the natural witnesses of the incident whose testimony was supported by medical evidence, the recovery and support of criminal weapons. Special plea for provocation, he did not appeal the reasoning and did not confirm any direct or circumstantial indictment which was attributed to the accused. Matched the rifle recovered from, the contents of the FIR without harm, were confirmed by eyewitnesses at each material point. That was because the incident was not denied, there was no shortage of conviction for the accused and the trial court sentenced the accused to death.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Daulat Pur lawyer