Find a Lawyer

MAHMOOD AND PERVEZ ASSOCIATES versus KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXX, RRL & 2 Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, Regulation 13 (3), Suit for Declaration, Permanent Order Against Temporary and Plaintiff against Plaintiff Damage to injunction restraint. Under construction, the original owner obtained approval from the authorities in 1960 for the construction of the ground floor, but without the approval of the competent authority's applicant, the construction was extended to the fifth floor. The building lifted more unauthorized structures. The authority removed the seventh floor to the floor, but the remaining six floors could not be demolished because the plaintiff's original owner, who had only obtained approval from the authority to construct the ground floor, had irregularly constructed the fifth floor and Planned after the unauthorized construction. The Authority T has stated good objections to the construction. The original owner, who was not compliant with the claimant, fulfilled the required conditions in paragraph 13 (3) of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations after the purchase of the building. Without taking any more unauthorized and illegal structures, under the circumstances, the provisions could not take refuge. He said that the rule failed to file a lawsuit against the plaintiff authority, which was a legal entity, that could not be prevented from ending its legal, duties, temporarily dismissing the application for a stay order. Was gone, which is not good. online advocate from Kazi Ahmed lawyer