Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Pakistan Panel Code Section 302/34 Testimony of Evidence The two witnesses' ocular testimony was credible because they successfully tolerated cross-examination and during their inter-testimony or between trial and prior statements. Even the slightest contradiction was not revealed. By defense, the eyewitnesses were related to the mutilation, but because of this they would not make interested persons in the absence of evidence of a false trap motive, the defense could not say that the complainant had false implications. How to get from Even if the eyewitnesses are of interest to the witnesses, their testimony should not be dismissed altogether, but can be accepted with caution and co-operation when the recovery of the shotgun guns at the scene can assist the medical evidence. That a shotgun from the casualties advocate from Chowk Azam lawyer