ABDUL ALEEM versus GENERAL PUBLIC
CPC Appearance and Disappearance of Civil Procedure Code Order IX O IX, R 9 Dismissal Request for Rehabilitation Applicants did not present their evidence for rehabilitation although they were given many opportunities for integration. The request for was dismissed. The applicant's trial court's stand was that on the previous date when the applicant brought his evidence, the trial court had earlier dismissed the application in the final hours, which, through the respondents. It was denied that the trial court did not convene to determine this important question. His testimony, however, was dismissed by the court before his expiry of the court's jurisdiction, where the matter was not settled on the default and evidence was given to the parties in support of their contempt. Was not allowed to appear, the trial court ordered the removal of the petition by default because the matter was kept too old, instead of seeking remand for rehabilitation, by the High Court. Central request for decision was restored within the stipulated period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Garh More lawyer
