TAHIRUDDIN versus THE STATE
The testimony of the prosecution of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, which did not support the prosecution case in its evidence, was not awarded by the prosecution. No real attempt was made to ascertain the presence of his other alleged evidence. The investigating officer, who handled the matter in a comfortable way, did not encourage the trust as it was alleged that the recovery did not have any effect. The accused's case is highly suspicious. There can be no punishment and the accused was entitled to be acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Fizagat lawyer
