MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus T.J. EBRAHIM & CO.
Law Reform Ordinance 1972 Sections 10 (1) and (2) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 = Terms of Sections 10 (1) and (2) of Intra Court Appeal Retention, Companies Ordinance, 1984 Applicable Companies Was already injured Section 10, the scope of subsections (1) and (2) of the Companies Ordinance was material and substantially different, as in the previous case the company was injured, while other orders And the latter of the provisions of the decisions were covered. Section 10, Companies Ordinance, Section (1) of 1984, could not be limited to merely challenging the accuracy of the concurrent order, and this included the orders passed thereafter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Rabwah lawyer