SALEEM AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
Article 8 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961 Sue for dissolving a marriage on the basis of wife The allegations of misconduct, non-payment of restitution and unethical plaintiff by the wife against her husband were stated that she died Instead of preferring to live with her husband before and after the trial, the attempt to reconcile with the spouse at different stages was unsuccessful. The husband committed adultery under sections 10, 11, 16 and 19 of the adultery ( Enforcement Hood) was registered under the Ordinance 1979 for adultery, which led to his being contested in the Supreme Court and the prosecution of the case. Subsequently, she filed a petition against her husband under Section 14, Kazf (Enforcement Head) Ordinance 1979, and several other criminal cases were filed against each other by the spouse, the trial court dismissed. It was held by the wife that when she had been married to the defendant for about thirty years and had given birth to children, it was possible for the spouse to remain in the hood as well. She was married and gave birth to seven children, three of whom were alive and young, preferring to live separately and trying to break the marriage, She showed nothing but intense hatred against her husband. The wife does not like to dissolve the opportunity to live together, especially when she spent her young life with her because husband Happy Union was always a bilateral lady who lived with her husband for about thirty thirty years She later left her husband's home and suffered constant pain. A long-standing criminal and civil lawsuit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Shankiari lawyer