Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus WARIS ALI

CPC Decision Civil Procedure Code Order XX and Dreati O XX, R 18 Appeal for division of property by a co-owner of a landlord and tenant relationship Declaration Appellants challenge the sale process Had previously denied the defendant's title. And thereafter, in the case of division (existing litigation) the effect was that the underground was common and never divided. The appellant owned more than his share and the defendant was entitled to the extent of his share of the land. Take over Through the distribution of the property during the arguments, the appellant requested that if the property was joint and the distribution was approved, the possession of the appellant should not be disturbed as he was initially a resident, anyone. Could not approve it. And simultaneously reproach, neither party can be allowed to blow hot and cold, and at the same time appellants cannot be allowed to appeal in contentious positions. Landlords and tenants who once rejected a tenant relationship could not be allowed to raise a new request that their occupation as a tenant be protected when the respondents once denied the tenancy. The payee had the option to accept the position and file a lawsuit to recover the occupation. , Where the appellants cannot be allowed to take a contradictory position by acknowledging that they are the respondent of the tenant when he has beyond a doubt proved that he is a shareholder in the property, the property is shared and the property is divided. Respondent is legally entitled to exclude part of it. Oh advocates from Chak Sawara lawyer