Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN versus BOARD OF REVENUE, AJ&K


Section,,, and the Azad Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 19744), Article 42 and the Constitution 44 Constitution petitioner applied for the approval of the landlord in favor of the plaintiff in favor of the proprietor's rights. Was challenged by notary land including over 30 kanals of land, respondents regularized the notes of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and sanctioned such land as provided under Sections 5 and 8 of the Pure Land (Amendment) Act, 1989. , Which was merged with the Tribunals of Accreditation below. That the respondents' possession, which includes notarized land, could not exceed 30 kanals. This question of fact could not be resolved in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Jampur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.