Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN versus BOARD OF REVENUE, AJ&K

Section,,, and the Azad Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 19744), Article 42 and the Constitution 44 Constitution petitioner applied for the approval of the landlord in favor of the plaintiff in favor of the proprietor's rights. Was challenged by notary land including over 30 kanals of land, respondents regularized the notes of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and sanctioned such land as provided under Sections 5 and 8 of the Pure Land (Amendment) Act, 1989. , Which was merged with the Tribunals of Accreditation below. That the respondents' possession, which includes notarized land, could not exceed 30 kanals. This question of fact could not be resolved in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. list of supreme court advocates from Chowk Munda lawyer