Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

THE STATE versus SAMI ULLAH


Section 4 of the contempt of court Act 1976, the honorees of the Court of Containment of Court carried a procession consisting of 100/150 persons to the gate of the High Court where they chanted slogans against the High Court judges. Judges were declared jihalas and their decisions were termed a backward matter, after which they went to the mosque and made various speeches and one of the contenders addressed a press conference in which he was unconditional against the High Court judges. Apologize and present yourself. At the mercy of the judicial effect, even though the claimants admitted their guilt and demanded an unconditional pardon, the court was defamed and the contempt was planned and allegedly deliberate. The misconduct claimed was not appropriate to cover the damage they had done to the High Court, not accepting the defendants' unconditional waiver but lowering their aforementioned plea. Was considered.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.