THE STATE versus SAMI ULLAH
Section 4 of the contempt of court Act 1976, the honorees of the Court of Containment of Court carried a procession consisting of 100/150 persons to the gate of the High Court where they chanted slogans against the High Court judges. Judges were declared jihalas and their decisions were termed a backward matter, after which they went to the mosque and made various speeches and one of the contenders addressed a press conference in which he was unconditional against the High Court judges. Apologize and present yourself. At the mercy of the judicial effect, even though the claimants admitted their guilt and demanded an unconditional pardon, the court was defamed and the contempt was planned and allegedly deliberate. The misconduct claimed was not appropriate to cover the damage they had done to the High Court, not accepting the defendants' unconditional waiver but lowering their aforementioned plea. Was considered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer