LUQMAN SHAH versus DISTRICT JUDGE, HARIPUR
The appearance and absence of the parties to the CPC's Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in O IX, Rr 6 and 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 164 against the defendants, issuing the former Part Decree Who failed to appear has remained silent for a long time on the due date for hearing against the defendant in the court and after more than a year filed a petition for directing the former party through which Had to be Defendant was filed more than a year after the prescribed period, within 30 days after the passing of the previous party order provided under Article 164 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the courts were rightfully rejected. That they are expected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Sihala lawyer
