Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD OZAIR versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB

The entries in the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 52 Revenue Record, especially in particular and especially in Jamabandi, identify the harmonious results of the following courts, showing that underground, under respondent's government (Government). Includes three courts. The court was the appropriate plaintiff on the record on the basis of material / evidence / evidence, the plaintiff alleging not to present documentary evidence in support of his claim Pla also made an alternative claim for title by adverse possession in the particular case. Spoke out against. question The plaintiffs' failure to prove their claim, lack of evidence to prove their ownership of the underground land was properly sealed, and the plaintiff's failure to present their case before them. Were suitable for the environment. Haven, the three courts below, together with the selection of the petitions and evidence before the court, also found that the defendant (government) was the owner of the land acquired, and such results are obtained with the help of revenue records and so on. As such, to be discovered in reality was not open to challenge, except when there was no illegal, unauthorized and unreadable or false advertising. The evidence, was identified immigration advocates email from Pirpai lawyer