AMIN BADSHAH versus NARGIS SALEEM AHMED
In the payment of monthly rent for Sections 10, 15 and 21, the tenant appellant continued to send the rent by default through the postal money order and thus the landlord had to permanently receive the same tenant appellant. Refused to submit the rent to the rental court. After the expiry of one year, the tenant had ordered the tenant to withdraw the appeal on the basis of default in payment of rent. In the legal matter, the tenant / appellant was legally required to submit the rent to the rent controller in the court, in which case the landlord / defendant had jurisdiction. Denied that he had a money order sent to him. There was no misrepresentation of evidence and irregularities in the decision rendered by the rent controller. Had successfully proven.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Nankana Sahib lawyer
