Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUZAFFAR ABBAS versus KANA DIVISION

Articles 23 and 8 of the Civil Servants Act 1973 Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The sole complaint of an elderly civil servant was that the date of his appointment in BS 17 should be considered 1 4 1973 instead of 1 1974. It was confirmed by the Department Authorities and Service Tribunal Validity Service Tribunal that the applicant joined the job as a job 1973, his such service was regularized from an earlier date in 1981. , Namely 1 1974, should have regularly challenged the earlier date. The appropriate forum within the stipulated period but he failed to do so, but taking such a step in the silence of the civil servant would go a long way in protecting the interests of the defendants, however, from the regular use of public servants from 1974 to 1974. The President had practically imposed. Under section 23, the Civil Servants Act, 1973, the powers cannot be terminated by a subsidiary agency. The service tribunal was also justified in preventing complaints from civil servants. According to the order dated 23 4 1981, who filed a representation before him on 20 2 1982, after a period of ten months, thus, the representation of the civil servant was clearly put forward. And for that reason, his appeal was rightly rejected by the service tribunal. Public employment law was lifted by a public servant to guarantee interference, an appeal was denied attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Head Marala lawyer