Find a Lawyer

KHALID NAWAZ versus THE STATE

The police constable, who was accompanied by the complainant / assistant sub-inspector of police at the relevant time, did not appear in the recovery of any of the evidence under Section 9, 21 and 22 of the Drugs Act 1997 Therefore, the officer below the rank of Police Inspector can provide. No possession of any public place and no person was authorized to search and arrest anyone for drug recovery, which was connected to the jurisdiction of the law without which legal proceedings could be instituted, Without which the proceedings could not be initiated, the search, arrest and recovery proceedings could not be initiated by the complainant, who was only Assistant Sub Inspector of Police Recovery Memo in this case, which was certified by the police constable and not any individual. Was not included with the Complainant / Assistant Sub Inspector, in which the accused is detained I had no choice but to take, search and arrest him, the alleged recovery must have been witnessed by such a police officer's subordinate office. There was no legal force under the circumstances. The sentence filed against the accused was illegal and illegal. It was illegal and was set aside. law websites from Jandanwala lawyer