PERVAIZ versus STATE
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Examining the evidence was not unusual for the complainant's accused, but even if he was an interested witness, his testimony also affected trust and He may not have been present at the time of the incident. In addition, the testimony of the complainant was confirmed by another free and invisible eye witness who offered a plausible explanation for his presence on the occasion, in which case the accused was sentenced. And the number of casualties received by the three accused offered their general intention to kill the deceased and dismissed the possibility of finding that there was no record in his favor. Should have been punished with punishment, the accused should have been punished according to everyone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Theing Jattan More lawyer