Find a Lawyer

TAJ MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Sections 157 (2) and 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act 1969 alleges the forfeiture of the truck was taking the Narcotics Appellant (owner) in response to the notice that the driver and cleaner of the truck loaded the prohibited items. Was. It convinced the adjusting authority without its consent and information that hiding the prohibited chars in the specially designed cavity of the truck (without the permission of the appellant truck) was not possible without the consent of the appellant and Used for smuggling with information. , He was not entitled to release it and the same confiscation was maintained accordingly family advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer