MEHMOOD SULTAN versus THE STATE
Section 302/34 Police Rules, 1934, 8 25 21 = Death Statement of Appreciation of Evidence, a relevant recording of a police station house officer recorded by the injured complainant in the case of Murcella and stated that the injured complainant later Died, the hospital ward in the emergency ward objected that Mursila could not be treated as a dying declaration because it was not listed in accordance with the provisions of the Police Rules, 8 25% of 1934, the complainant. He was seriously injured and the Investigating Officer / Section HA was recorded feeling the condition of the injured, in the absence of a magistrate, The statement signing / thumb was also influenced by two marginal witnesses, the only minor witness in one case was subjected to a lengthy cross-examination, but nothing was brought to the record, according to the suspect, All material facts were disclosed in this regard and the process of the accused in connection with his medical report, the recovery of the vacancy of crime on occasion, and his regularly confirmed death statement through general testimony, thus, any substance. Without it, the situation was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer