Find a Lawyer

SAIFAL KHAN versus ALLAH DINO

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 of the contract terminates the contract for the plaintiff to sell the execution on behalf of the plaintiff by a partner and executed by a partner had gone. The co-sharers who authorized the executives to sell the land in question to the shareholders, while the appeals court was dismissed to the extent that the shareholder was not supportive of such agreement, though the trial court In spite of all the facts recorded by the source, the acquittal was denied. , On the basis that possession relief can only be obtained through a tenancy tribunal and that the civil court had no jurisdiction to grant such relief that the legal agreement for sale was accepted by the executive. Which was not exercised by all the participants. In fact, a joint written statement with him was submitted that he submitted to the executive that he had not executed the contract of sale by himself and other partners, but that in the initial proceedings the recipient had litigation. After a settlement with, he had the option of transferring the property, on behalf of the co-executive, to the previous action. They executed the sales agreement) signed the same agreement, and in the presence of some partner partners, it was signed by the executive who had endorsed the same share of the representative's shareholders and acknowledged it 62 According to Kant, therefore, the trial court amended 67 percent of the land covered to such an extent. solicitors from Cherat lawyer