Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus TAPIR SHOAIB-RASHID SHOAIB


Civil Procedure 1908 Section 96, O XVII, R 3 and O XLI, R 23 Verification of Evidence Prior to the verdict and injunction O XVII by the Appellate Court was not mandatory in the nature of the CPC where there was not enough material on record. That is, the court should adjourn the case so as to enable the parties to present their evidence and then decide the case concisely because the parties' rights to the proceedings under XVII, R must ultimately be decided. 3, the CPC should record its findings on the trial court's entire content after approving the previous order / decision in the case, acting illegally and without legal authority. , The High Court accepted the appeal, remanding the previous judgment and order. To allow the trial court to present its evidence to the parties

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Sakrand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.