GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus TAPIR SHOAIB-RASHID SHOAIB
Civil Procedure 1908 Section 96, O XVII, R 3 and O XLI, R 23 Verification of Evidence Prior to the verdict and injunction O XVII by the Appellate Court was not mandatory in the nature of the CPC where there was not enough material on record. That is, the court should adjourn the case so as to enable the parties to present their evidence and then decide the case concisely because the parties' rights to the proceedings under XVII, R must ultimately be decided. 3, the CPC should record its findings on the trial court's entire content after approving the previous order / decision in the case, acting illegally and without legal authority. , The High Court accepted the appeal, remanding the previous judgment and order. To allow the trial court to present its evidence to the parties
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Naudero lawyer