MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE
Section 497 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 2 (b), 4 and Schedule Guarantee, Grant of Identity Parade was conducted after a period of four months and the proposed dummy of the Identity Parade. Ratio was done. The violation of the definition without explanation was reduced to the value of the identity of the accused, and no case was brought against the accused and the FIR was not allowed to mention the details of the unknown accused. And in the statement under 5 161, the PCP will doubt the role. The accused police officer was responsible for recording the statement and initially inquiring with the complainant and witnesses when the FIR and police statements about the suspect's details were being recorded. An arrest warrant was not prepared, it appears. The case prosecution, in the circumstances, failed to establish a reasonable case against the accused for the purpose of bail, the bail was granted to the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Pir Mahal lawyer