Find a Lawyer

REHMATULLAH versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM

The plaintiff's request for the preparation of original documents was rejected by the Appellate Court's Civil Procedure Code Order XLI, R 27 and Section 115 of the Appeal Court regarding the original documents, the appellate court additionally The importance of the document being presented was not taken into account by the plaintiffs in their plea that they were able to locate the documents under question at the time of the application, such as during the trial. Non-production of evidence was neither intentional nor intentional but because of the evidence given to the court as specified in the application. The importance of which the plaintiff wanted to present, where evidence was required at the appeal stage, was inevitable and it is likely to go to the root of the matter for a fair and equitable decision, such a delay in making such an application. It was not enough to refuse the production request. Evidence Defendants were allowed to present additional evidence before the appellate court law firms from Dadakhel lawyer