WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus GHULAM SHABBIR
The Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 78 document has not been substantiated and the effect document which was not properly proven cannot be read in evidence even though it has been exhibited without the other party's objection. I did not become a part of which the following courts relied on. The public record, therefore, required that the plaintiff, who was then relying on him to summon the author in this case, provide evidence so that the same could be proved to him, in the letter, not to appear. Later, it did not prove, therefore, that it is not possible to read in evidence the letter constituted the main body of the plaintiff's case, therefore, excluding him from the evidence and leaving his statement to the plaintiff. It could not be relied upon in favor of admission. Specify the issue especially when the defendant's evidence contradicts his statement
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer
