NAZAR HUSSAIN versus STATE
The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/449 evidence and the incident as it happened, as the prosecution's witnesses have indicated, indicates that the accused had committed cold blood, the premeditated murder. Had committed and the accused pursued the victim and fired him. Firing rounds around the house and even at the closed door where the victim was taking shelter to save his life, such behavior and behavior of the accused cannot be lightly ignored. I testified fully that no hostility existed between the accused and the complaining party, that the blanks of the crime were found to be enclosed in arms, admitting that the accused had licensed property and in this case Good witnesses also supported the recovery of the pistol allegedly used by the accused and There was very little room for the accused to be ballistic. The expert married that the weapon of crime was recovered from the crime scene by chance, in which case, the participant did not claim that he was improperly trapped and that the complaining party itself had committed the alleged abusive relationship with the victim. Due to wanting to have an illicit relationship with the accused against the accused, in which case the accused did not make a case or forgery was actually possible the accused had committed the murder in the presence of witnesses. After the case was retained, the trial court convicted and sentenced the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer