RAZA MUSTAFA versus THE STATE
According to the Section 497 (5) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337 F (ii) / 337 L (ii) / 337 D Guarantee, five of the accused were injured by the cancellation of the accused, one of which was abdomen. Was on the stomach. The witness who was an important part and since such accused was liable under section 3377D, PPC which was later included and which came under the prohibition contained in section 7497 (1), c. The CPC lower courts were apparently misled in granting bail to the accused. The fact is that in the third column of the FIR, the prohibition of the crimes mentioned was not covered by the prohibited clause. There was reason to believe that the accused was sentenced to ten years in prison. \ If the police refrain from mentioning or enforcing this section. It was the first applicable, then at least the accused could not be charged with any aggravating motions, the accused's bail was recently revoked.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Dadakhel lawyer
