Find a Lawyer

SAMIR AHSAN ULLAH versus GARDNER, ADVOCATE

He was sued by the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Section 41 Advocate Advocate for professional misconduct but subsequently appeared before himself and the trial was reinstated, but because of this Discharged. Illegal Prosecutor Advocate once again engaged the complainants to file an appeal against a civil judge's decision but was dismissed for not filing a complaint with the court, then proceeded to prosecute another lawyer. Done but the advocate related, even though he was not engaged by them. A compromise was made and an order was filed against the complainant even though he was neither affiliated with it nor authorized to appear before him and to request a settlement. Was in legal matters who sought to prosecute the complainants and to initiate proceedings in his name in person. In terms of the very purpose and property in which they were professionally engaged, and thus defeating their purpose, he left no ammunition in his arsenal, nor the charge of professional mismanagement. The plaintiff was an advocate nor failed to present a case of professional mismanagement, dismissal / dismissal of cases without authorization, he was also subject to other misconduct when he initiated proceedings in connection with his property against the same property. For he was engaged in protecting the interests and rights of the complainant, so did the Advocate There was no confession because he held on list of advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer