Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus ABDUL RAUF


Balochistan Tenancy Ordinance 1978 Section 63 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Claims for the right of tenancy by the applicants with the jurisdiction of title to the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction and the tenant relationship between the parties. It was decided and decided by the existing Revenue Court, which was the primary jurisdiction to look into the matter, however, it could not be stopped, simply by the applicant claiming to be a tenant, landlord and tenant. Cedar's relationship did not exist in asserting jurisdiction or any jurisdiction by the Revenue Court There is no fault in the decision, the leave to appeal in the Supreme Court was denied against such order.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from FR DI Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.