Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ-UL-ISLAM versus THE STATE

Sections 4, 5 and 7 of the Explosives Act 1908 Suppress the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 charged with the FIR regarding the presence and recovery of alleged weapons from the accused The statement was inconsistent with the testimony. The prosecution's witness, who was allegedly conscientious of the prosecution's recovery memo, failed to produce, in the circumstances, credible, satisfactory and convincing evidence under which to prosecute the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 A case can be supported against the permissibility of the accused. The section of this Act, which was a prerequisite and condition for the prosecution of the accused under section 18 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, which could not be obtained, the entire action against the accused was void and without jurisdiction. Was convicted by the trial, in the circumstances, kept aside divorce advocates from Sagri lawyer