Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ-UL-ISLAM versus THE STATE


Sections 4, 5 and 7 of the Explosives Act 1908 Suppress the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 charged with the FIR regarding the presence and recovery of alleged weapons from the accused The statement was inconsistent with the testimony. The prosecution's witness, who was allegedly conscientious of the prosecution's recovery memo, failed to produce, in the circumstances, credible, satisfactory and convincing evidence under which to prosecute the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 A case can be supported against the permissibility of the accused. The section of this Act, which was a prerequisite and condition for the prosecution of the accused under section 18 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, which could not be obtained, the entire action against the accused was void and without jurisdiction. Was convicted by the trial, in the circumstances, kept aside

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Jaja Abasian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.