Find a Lawyer

NASREEN RIAZ versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Reasons 6, 8 and 21 of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 9 and 199 Constitutional Applicants of the Punjab Kuchi Population Act 1992 for the construction of overhead bridges for the public to construct their houses on public land. There was a need to evacuate. Under the objectives, the applicants were offered accommodation in exchange for government residential land by the government. The petitioners had approached the High Court to claim the interest so as to resist this move of public interest. Applicants had long occupied such land, built residences and provided necessary facilities through the authorities, so they were entitled to provide compensation / restitution according to law upon eviction from their existing locations. Will be. The mistake of residing in land, which is owned by the government, even if it is not regarded as raw settlements, for the consent of the government, is still the responsibility of the state to write the article in the constitution. Article 2A guarantees the basic right to care for its citizens in promoting social justice according to 2A Article 9 of the Constitution guarantees the freedom of life and the basic human rights of those who lose their lives. The right to live with dignity and what goes with it, the bare necessities of life, is to be a document of social agreement. Indeed, seeking justice was the weakest right even as private fundamental rights have to be subordinated to the public interest The government and its agencies have to work on a scheme / policy within six months to restore / compensate applicants. The direction of list of advocates from Lahore lawyer