Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ versus STATE

The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance was charged with the recovery of a pistol charged with defining Section 13E evidence of 1965 and the charge sheet proved beyond doubt that no motive was served. Neither the police can be falsely implicated nor the testimony of the prosecution witnesses under which the accused is prosecuted under Section 13E of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. The trial court was retained, but given the circumstances of the defendant's sentencing. In the interest of justice was reduced lawer from fb area from Pindi gheb lawyer