Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM-II, STENOGRAPHER versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the Civil Servants Act 1973 appeared in serial number 16 in the advertisement and specific pay petition securities list for development; the applicant admitted that none of his juniors was in development. It was justified to dismiss the service tribunal Applicant of the applicant was also claiming a special salary of Rs 150 instead of Rs 120, the service tribunal had refused to relieve the applicant on the basis that earlier. In the appeal filed by the applicant, he claimed Rs 120 as special salary which led him to pay Rs. The sentence was given. After claiming Rs 120 per month as special salary and getting the same thing, he was not open to resentment on the same issue; the decision of the service tribunal did not face any weakness so that the Supreme Court intervened. The appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court in the circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer