Border Servants (Appointments, Promotions and Exchanges) Rules 1989 R10 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Employees' retirement on the medical ground was designated as employee's place and made his employment regular. Who claimed that being the nephew of a retired employee, it was claimed that he was entitled to appointment at the place of retired employee and that the job of the respondents was neither valid nor the bail petitioner's case was dismissed by the High Court. Was done. No legal claim was made for the post which was vacated due to his retirement; instead, only the children of the deceased employees could be appointed, who was neither the employee's son nor the employee at the time of request. The deceased died during his employment, therefore, the applicant had none. The hiring decision by the employees on the vacant post for appointment to the vacant post also indicated that the applicant had applied for his or her position on the basis of kinship. Claim released. Based on the evidence on record, the Onish Trial Court found that the defendants were regularized on the basis of their record of service, not on the basis of the recommendation and their formal arrangements were made by the competent authority. Also, the applicant had never applied for this position and because of his relationship-based claim to law, he had no locus standi to challenge respondent's appointment, The leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
