ZUBAIDA versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ BUTT
Revision of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 185 and 188 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, R1 Supreme Court decision under which leave of appeal was dismissed 447 days for cancellation of part of the judgment sought by the applicant. Was prevented by the court but there was error on the order of the Supreme Court which was also tried to review as it lifted certain portions of the High Court verdict from the earlier decision of 20 20 1993, After that, there was a second round of litigation but the previous decision was observed. As if by: The High Court found the petition for review in the second phase of litigation in which the Supreme Court exercised its own amending authority in its question on Article 188 of the Constitution. Order should be reviewed. Such limitations would be of importance in this case, even otherwise, the applicant was not given notice by the court at the hearing stage for the leave application. In his absence, an appeal and order question was passed. The request for review was allowed with the instruction that the offending part of the High Court's earlier decision be dismissed by the order dismissing the appeal of the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer