Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM QASIM versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/411/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 14 of the Code of Evidence (10 of 10) 1984), Article 40 bail was not recovered from the vacant or spent bullet, the pistol was recovered at the notice of the accused. He did not attach it to the crime. In some places the accused were identified and shown in the site plan. That it could be considered unacceptable, apart from ignoring Article 40 of the Convention of Martyrdom, the 1984 Identity Parade, the role of the accused was not explained, and thus, he was responsible for the crime. Not be concerned, the accused was entitled to bail under section 497 of the first section of the female being. (1), CRPC and not charged with misconduct Sessions court's alleged privilege bail was not withdrawn under the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Padidan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.