MUHAMMAD ALTAF versus STATE
Articles 302 (b) / 149, 324/149 and 148 of Pakistan Constitution (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan were arguments that the deputy superintendent of police court examined as a witness that the accused was found innocent Refused to give. It has been considered in the correct context; that the order to release the magistrate's suspects was kept without hearing their record and no evidence. The ocular testimony found that the defendant's conviction in the absence of reliable and reliable supporting evidence regarding the perpetrators could not be established, especially when eyewitnesses were interested witnesses and The clear dispute between the medical evidence and the clear evidence was abandoned. Appeal leave allowed for no good reason to consider the impact of the shortage on trial properties
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Kotli lawyer
