BILQEES BIBI versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)/NOTIFIED OFFICER, GUJRANWALA
Articles 10 and 11 of the Homeless People (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the legacy of the original informant, who moved the request for cancellation of the allotment which, according to his claim. Based on the fraud, the Supreme Court during the preliminary proceedings denounced the hearing, the notification officer received a remand of the case after giving the relevant notification officer the opportunity to hear the post-remand proceedings. It was found that the original Ultimate High Court had allotted the property legitimately. The Order of the Notified Officer Validity Petitioners asserts that they, being the heirs of the original Informer, are necessary / proper parties and as such, may be heard by the Township Commissioner, and, thus, in their absence. No effective and legal order can be passed. That they were heard. That they have the right to claim the transfer of underground land. And that they were, in other words, the legal heirs of the original informants and the leave of appeal was allowed to consider the dispute raised and to determine the status / status of the informants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
