MAZHAR-UL-HAQ QURESHI versus YAQOOB BAIG MIRZA
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 212 and 185 (3) Appointment for Respondents of Special Post Respondents After holding the position of senior service and seniority in question, the High Court held that Was approved when the applicant was appointed by the official to transfer status to the High Court twice for the vacation of the order but against the approval of the dignity orders as there was no effect. The important thing was that the High Court was not entitled to entertain the Constitution and grant interim relief to the defendants. However, in view of the applicant's bar of Article 212, it has been stated that if a decision already pending before the High Court is decided immediately, then he shall file his leave for appeal. Respondents did not oppose this statement. In the constitutional petition, the High Court was directed to decide before or on the date specified by the Roth parties to appear in the High Court on the due date.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Mansehra lawyer