Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED KAUSAR versus HABIB BANK LIMITED.

Establishment of Office Delegation Ombudsman Order 1983 Article 32 Zakat (Recovery and Refund) Rules, 1981, R23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Maintenance Petitioner against the deduction of Zakat deduction from his account. Appeals to the jurisdiction of the content - that they were not the lineage in the relevant date when the deduction was made when the Federal Ombudsman ruled against the applicant that the applicant confessed before the court that the Federal Ombudsman Contrary to the defamation order, he did not transfer to the President within thirty days of the terms of Article 32, Establishment. The Constitutional petition was filed directly against the Federal Accountability Order, 1983 and the injunction petitioner's order, therefore, the effective remedy provided under Article 32 of Order 1 of 1983 was not taken advantage of before the High Court. Therefore, on this basis alone, he was not entitled to the constitutional discretion of the Federal High Court forums, if any, even if the applicant had elected himself, he would not have avoided the effect of the legal provisions. The Federal Ombudsman Order cannot be challenged except under the delegation of President Pakistan to the Delegated Ombudsman at the highest office. Judicial personality to be made, the legal front against them in order to open suspended. Especially when all executive officials were required to work under Article 3 (3) of Order 1 of 1983 to support an impeachment order approved by the Federal Ombudsman because of a jurisdiction in the constitutional petition Can't review. list of supreme court advocates from Kunjah lawyer