Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MISS SURRAYA PARVEEN versus SH. ANWAR-UL-HAQ


It is permissible to consider whether the designated defects of the High Court affected Article 58 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1962?

P L D 1964 Supreme Court 194

Present : A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Fazle‑Akbar, J

Miss SURRAYA PARVEEN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

Sh. ANWAR‑UL‑HAQ AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 20 of 1964, decided on 11th February 1964.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 31st October 1963, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 230 of 1963).

Special Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court

-----

---‑Granted to consider whether defect found by High Court in order impugned did or did not affect appellant‑ Constitution of Pakistan, 1962, Art. 58 (3).

Muhammad Bakhsh Mir Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Naziruddin Attorney for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 11th February 1964.

ORDER

CORNELIUS, C. J.‑

We grant leave to appeal. It is urged that the flaw found by the Single Judge to vitiate the order of the Chief Settlement Commissioner is one which does not necessarily affect the direction given in respect of the residential plot in favour of the petitioners. The Letters Patent Bench dismissed the appeal on the ground that the order made by the learned Single Judge, being an order sending the case back to the Chief Settlement Commissioner for a fresh decision, is not a final order. It would appear, however, that it has upset the decision in favour of the petitioners, which is entitled to finality, if their position is indeed not touched by the defect found in the treat ment of the claim of the respondent Sh. Anwar‑ul‑Haq.

Leave granted. Security Rs. 500. Possession to remain undisturbed pending disposal of the appeal.

K. B. A. Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Shogram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.