The Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, required the amendment of the bargain petitioner's request for amendment to the bargaining 68 because of the simple reason that he entered the name of an alternative seller instead of a vendor in the Verandi sub divisional canal officer. Rather than wanted. On another field, when the Nical Water Petitioner added a dispute in his application to the dispute, the sub divisional canal officer had not made any request regarding the nickel water order on that score.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
