Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH versus ABDUL RAHIM

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 1, R 10, O VII, R 11 and Section 9, 115 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 3 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Plaintiff Claiming Declaration for Correction of Date of Birth filed on Retirement, Civil Court dismisses this case for lack of Appellate Court on Plaintiff's request and ordering respondents to practice And after hearing all the cases, the case was remanded in the trial court for judgment. As regards the accuracy, the parties had correctly ruled that the plaintiff sought negative relief which the plaintiff could not grant, on the occasion of the confession of confession, he accepted and the relief sought by him was to avoid retirement. He was to retire from the terms and conditions. Services which were exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Civil Tribunal Service Tribunal and were barred by law plates for entertaining and assisting in such cases. The suit should be dismissed for any additional reason so that the case was filed against the respondent (University) which was outside the jurisdiction of the High Court and the defendant had no office in the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court. From, it was properly dealt with by the trial court officers. The provincial government was enforced at the appeal stage to grant the High Court jurisdiction, though no relief was sought from the plaintiff against them, till the plaintiff had no case that his date of birth on the matric certificate was 12 8 was 1935 while its original date of birth was 12 law firms from Raiwind lawyer