AHMAD SHER KHAN versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)/SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), SARGODHA DIVISION, SARGODHA
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 2 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 The petition against the allotment of land was filed before the cancellation of the rules of withdrawal on the matter in which the acquittal allotment was obtained. had gone. The fraudulent case was registered on the basis of the notified officer, which showed that the relevant claim form was never transferred to the village, therefore, no question of allotment was raised against the claim, the High Court said. The right to refuse to interfere with its constitutional process was justified by the High Court's cancellation of the price for the sale buyers, now controversially presented during the solicitation petition and claim before the purchase was made. Was detected and established forgery. In the jurisdiction of the Constitution by the applicants, the High Courts deemed it appropriate to refuse to interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction. Settlement cannot be requested for unlawful or illegal gain or to be subject to injustice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from North Wazirstan lawyer