Find a Lawyer

SHAKIR ULLAH KHAN versus MADAD KHAN ORAKZAI

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), part of the land in question, was obtained by the authority, the plaintiff's request for amendment to the plaintiff and the enforcement of the authority and from acquisition. It was rejected by all the courts, including the beneficiary High Court, their application for leave of appeal was turned into an appeal and it was dealt with the directive that the amount of compensation paid to the shopkeepers was deposited in the court. Failure will be paid to the party entitled to the same Wendys. In order to deposit so much money in the court, they request that they receive the compensation as they are entitled to the land, and there is no Supreme Court directive to reimburse them. , They were not obliged to deposit the same amount in court. The Supreme Court's directive was expressed in clear and unambiguous terms that the compensation amount would be deposited in the pending pre-industry. Einswinds, which admittedly received the compensation amount, is a decision of the trial court of the High Court. The same amount was required to be deposited in front of the court, the required amount of vendors required by the court to pay the land compensation amount in full and in compliance with the Supreme Court decision. The leave to appeal any interference was denied in the circumstances online advocate from Chicha watni lawyer