CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE versus FLYING BOARD & PAPER PRODUCTS
Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was dealt with by the defendants in favor of the trial court on a contract to exchange in a shop for consideration of a certain amount. In the review, the Appellate Court and the High Court rejected the trial court's order, considering the agreement as a mortgage agreement, apparently because the stand was not written by the author, so the appeal was allowed It may be noted that there was a contract to sell the evidence of such an agreement which did not result in any agreement as neither the executor nor her husband could act on the question. Was a voluntary mortgage agreement on the oath, and did not subject himself to cross examination.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
