Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus ZAFFAR HUSSAIN

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Re-investigation of the case was registered on the direction of the complainant from the High Court under which no notice was issued. Unverified statements of some witnesses were condemned. 164 164, CCP was not sufficient to pardon the accused even though the investigation in this case was not yet completed, however, the report was prepared by the Department HA, which was confirmed by D-Section P, for the accused's release. And the area magistrate number agreed. The accused attempted to recover Kalashnikov to kill the alleged victims, otherwise determined by the Kalashnikov Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975 and the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 Weapons, Area Magistrates had no jurisdiction to exclude the accused and arbitrarily pass the unwanted order in a mechanical and immoral manner as a result of which the crime was fresh by law according to the law. Dyer was set aside to direct the investigation immigration advocate from Sahiwal lawyer