Find a Lawyer

SAWAN versus ABDULLAH

The Conan e testimony order 1984 Section 19 legal testimony (10 of 1984), Article 118 Proof's controversial documentary evidence and oral contradictory evidence The plaintiff asserts that his contribution to the supply of irrigation water for the interests of the defendants Damaged and deny each other. There were some entries in the old controversy that found the mutually contradictory and untrustworthy Appellate Court finding that the burden on the plaintiffs in disclosing it had failed to be excluded, open to questioning by the plaintiff. Not that they failed to prove that spoiling their share in irrigation water supply was not appropriate. famous high court advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer