Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus GUL MUHAMMAD

Approved by the High Court under CPC Review Section 12 (2) and Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII of the XLVII, R1 Sindh Rated Premise Ordinance (XVII of 1979), Section 20 Application Section 12 (2) Request for review of the order, CPC directed both parties to include their evidence in support of the relevant conviction that the maintenance error indicated on the bar was in fact not clear on the record while the applicant was available on record from the court. Efforts are under way to review the content and it is proposed to be included in support of the application under Section 12 (2). ), CPC CPC was not available to withdraw the order under Section 20, Sindh Rated Premise Ordinance, the 1979 Order of the Court can be returned only if it was factual and subordinate or a court / authority. Or regulates tribunal procedure but there is no court order. This law may be recalled under special law. The arguments presented in support of the request for order review touch on the merits of the application under section 1. 2 (2), the CPC which could not be decided at an earlier stage, in which case the application for review of the court order was not sustained in the circumstances. best advocate from Chak Jhumra lawyer