Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.


Border Public Service Commission Act 1973 Section 7 Northwestern Frontier Province Public Service Commission (Duties) Rules, 1983, R3 and Schedule A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Requirements Regulatory Requirements, Regulatory Requirements Issuing a writ in mandamus to directly regulate the service of the order contract would be a violation of law, namely, Section 7, Northwestern Frontier Province Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1978 together with the North West Frontier Province Public Service Commission KR3 and Schedule A (Duties) Rolls, 1983, which recommends appointments in the province in BPS 16 to 20, should be made on the advice of the Public Service Commission on the basis of tests and tests conducted by the Commission for this purpose. , It can only be fulfilled at the request of law petitioners that their appointment was based on the examination conducted by the work. The High Court judges (distinguished process) would end their independence of the judiciary by the provincial government and it was violating the notion of separation of the judiciary from the executive, not only for the foundation but for the pending examination. What was also ineligible was made for appointment only on the basis of the contract. Such application was not available to the applicant who was appointed on specific terms and conditions. And without the express prayer for declaration that the constitutional provisions relating to the regular appointment of civil judges / magistrates under the Constitution were not allowed in the BPS17 quota, it was not possible to legally provide relief on the basis of such controversy, There was no litigation. The right to enforce those rights which they do not have, nor any such rights

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Feroz Watan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.