MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail, the sanction of the case against the accused was that he killed his wife as well as his family while they were in compromise. What was more, the prosecution's five witnesses were examined during the prosecution, but each of them withdrew its statement under Section 161, CR PC, and it was examined, even until adjourned. His father also denied the incident, saying that he did not know anything about it, in view of the contradictory statements made by the prosecution witnesses, There was no evidence linking the accused to the commission of the alleged crime, otherwise, as claimed by the FTR itself, it appears to be a case of intense and sudden provocation where his wife. On getting into a compromise position with his Pyromore, the accused killed both of them, in which case they were entitled to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Mailsi lawyer